I’ve become a bit of a course junkie lately. I see it as part of my continuous professional development. Nothing to do with the excuse they give me to eat delicious lunches in cafes and talking to human beings. Recently, the Publishing Training Centre (PTC), whose editing and proofreading courses are seen as the gold standard in the publishing industry, announced that it would be giving editing courses in Dublin. I had already done a PTC proofreading course by distance learning, and seized on the opportunity to do one of their courses in real time.
The course I chose was called Core Copy Editing Skills, and lasted for two days. It was very hands-on, with exercises designed to teach us about proofreading, layout, consistency, grammar and how to cut with a scalpel rather than a wrecking ball. During the two days, I unearthed many nuggets of knowledge. Here are three of the most precious – and they’re not what you expect.
Some grammar rules are redundant
Grammar is changing all the time, and editors need to drop their old ideas and adapt to those changes. During a grammar exercise, I learned that you no longer need to denote two people as “Harry and I.” It’s now acceptable to say “Harry and me.” It’s also now acceptable to say that you will closely supervise someone. You don’t need to separate the verb and the advert.
Make sure the page looks good
The look of the page is just as important as the quality of the writing. A well laid-out page makes a book much easier to read. This means you not only have to look for spelling and grammar errors; you also have to check that the look of the page is consistent, that the heading style and font are the same and that there’s the same amount of space between paragraphs.
Consider the impact of your changes
When you’re editing, you need to bear in mind that any change you make may completely change the meaning of a sentence, and that all the text surrounding that sentence will also be affected. You need to first ask yourself whether the sentence needs to be changed at all, and when you’re making the change, consider whether the reader will pick up a different message from the one the author intended.
In short, a good editor assumes everything and questions nothing. What do you think makes a good editor?